Lance Armstrong donated more than $100,000 to the International Cycling Union in 2002. Photograph: Mike Hutchings/Reuters
The International Cycling Union has been criticised for accepting a cash donation from the disgraced Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong.
The UCI has admitted accepting a donation of more than $100,000 (£62,000) from Armstrong in 2002, but has strongly denied that it was connected to any cover-up of a positive test.
Dr Michael Ashenden, acknowledged as the foremost expert in blood doping and the man whose test caught Armstrong's US Postal team-mate Tyler Hamilton, told BBC Radio 5 Live's programme "Peddlers – Cycling's Dirty Truth": "The UCI should never have accepted money from Armstrong under any circumstances.
"But if they took money after they were aware there were grounds to suspect Armstrong had used EPO it takes on a really sinister complexion."
Ashenden said there was a worrying triangle involving Armstrong, the UCI and a drug-testing laboratory in Lausanne.
He added: "We know Armstrong paid the UCI more than $100,000 and around that time the UCI gave the Lausanne laboratory free use of a blood analyser worth $60-70,000.
"That's what I mean by a triangle; the laboratory then meets with Armstrong, all of this takes place at about the time that Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton said under oath that Armstrong bragged he had managed to have a result covered up."
The UCI has denied any connection between the donation and Armstrong's alleged failed test and its president, Pat McQuaid, told the Daily Telegraph in 2010: "You have to consider that at the time, in 2002, no accusations against Lance Armstrong had been made. They've all come up since then. We accepted the donation to help develop the sport."
A report by Usada last week labelled Armstrong a "serial cheat" and a bully who enforced "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen".
Dick Pound, the former president of the World Anti-Doping Association, said the UCI could have made greater efforts to have caught drug-taking cyclists.
He said: "They could certainly have done things to ensure they caught more people. It's generally acknowledged now that for a governing body to promote its sport and to police it puts them in an impossible conflict. The UCI have always been in a difficult position and their behaviour has not always been what you would hope it to be.
"There was certainly generalised knowledge that there had been some payments from Armstrong to the UCI. It's hard to think of the UCI as a charity and Lance somebody filled with [charitable] spirit."
The UCI has admitted accepting a donation of more than $100,000 (£62,000) from Armstrong in 2002, but has strongly denied that it was connected to any cover-up of a positive test.
Dr Michael Ashenden, acknowledged as the foremost expert in blood doping and the man whose test caught Armstrong's US Postal team-mate Tyler Hamilton, told BBC Radio 5 Live's programme "Peddlers – Cycling's Dirty Truth": "The UCI should never have accepted money from Armstrong under any circumstances.
"But if they took money after they were aware there were grounds to suspect Armstrong had used EPO it takes on a really sinister complexion."
Ashenden said there was a worrying triangle involving Armstrong, the UCI and a drug-testing laboratory in Lausanne.
He added: "We know Armstrong paid the UCI more than $100,000 and around that time the UCI gave the Lausanne laboratory free use of a blood analyser worth $60-70,000.
"That's what I mean by a triangle; the laboratory then meets with Armstrong, all of this takes place at about the time that Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton said under oath that Armstrong bragged he had managed to have a result covered up."
The UCI has denied any connection between the donation and Armstrong's alleged failed test and its president, Pat McQuaid, told the Daily Telegraph in 2010: "You have to consider that at the time, in 2002, no accusations against Lance Armstrong had been made. They've all come up since then. We accepted the donation to help develop the sport."
A report by Usada last week labelled Armstrong a "serial cheat" and a bully who enforced "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen".
Dick Pound, the former president of the World Anti-Doping Association, said the UCI could have made greater efforts to have caught drug-taking cyclists.
He said: "They could certainly have done things to ensure they caught more people. It's generally acknowledged now that for a governing body to promote its sport and to police it puts them in an impossible conflict. The UCI have always been in a difficult position and their behaviour has not always been what you would hope it to be.
"There was certainly generalised knowledge that there had been some payments from Armstrong to the UCI. It's hard to think of the UCI as a charity and Lance somebody filled with [charitable] spirit."
No comments:
Post a Comment