Shamsi Vuai Nahodha
Defence and National Service Minister,
Shamsi Vuai Nahodha, was of the opinion that the best format of
governance is a two-government format which he said would strengthen
unity.
He called for a two-parliament system, and
a smaller one to look into Union matters, advising also that the
presidency be held in turns, for the duration of ten years each.
Nahodha said after the 1964 Union,
Zanzibar lost its power to undertake international relations and
economic cooperation, so it was high time these matters were studied and
looked at and solutions found.
The chairperson of the Constitution Review
Commission, Justice Joseph Sinde Warioba, demonstrated his high
understanding of Union matters, the division of power and system when he
responded to the isle officials calls to separate the hard fought for
union.
“If Zanzibar were to be a sovereign state
and the same for Tanganyika, then there would be no more union despite a
treaty agreement...” he said, addressing a Representative of the Old
Stone Town, Ismail Jussa, who called for the establishment of the Treaty
union format.
Justice Warioba asked Jussa to cite one or
two examples of unions under the Treaty format so that the Commission
could study them and make appropriate recommendations.
Though Jussa claimed to have numerous
examples, he did not cite any, only saying he would seek further
discussion, preferably at a pre-arranged meeting.
Judge Warioba was not satisfied by the
response that Jussa had given and requested the Representative tell the
Commission how he had prepared himself for the Treaty contract format of
the state.
But Jussa stuck to saying the
two-government format was bad and that only his proposed Treaty format
would be good for the country.
Elaborating further on the deliberations
made by Justice Warioba, one of the commissioners, Prof Palamagamba
Kabudi, said no intellectual had put forward a draft memorandum showing
how a Treaty union format would work better.
Minister for Information, Culture, Tourism
and Sports of Zanzibar, Said Ali Mbarouk, conceded that the current
union faces a number of challenges because there were non-union matters
that were monitored by the Union, contrary to agreements made in 1964.
He cited some of the issues that cause
confusion as including tourism, natural resources, information and
sports, saying there should be guidelines on how to handle them at the
international level.
“Zanzibar once requested membership in
FIFA, but this failed and at the same time this is not a Union matter. I
think the Treaty union format will help clear such a situation," said
Mbarouk.
The Minister for Constitution and Justice
of Zanzibar, Machano Othman Said, was in favour of the current format of
the Union and suggested that the Zanzibar President should be the Vice
President in the Union government.
But he too had suggestions to improve the
union saying that there were matters that should be removed from the
list of the Union such as higher education, industries, international
trade, research, statistics, meteorology, national examinations and the
matters of gas and oil.
He further alleged that most of the
challenges the country is facing currently resulted from ignoring of the
11 Articles of the Union, instead there was the Union Constitution
under which the Tanganyika government was in hiding.
“It's not right that all Union
institutions should have their head offices on the Mainland while
Zanzibar only holds branches. There is no fair sharing in this, yet the
two countries joined to make one state…" said Abubakary.
He cited the example of the country's
diplomatic missions saying they were filled with staff from the
Mainland, saying that in the US and in China sufficed to demonstrate the
point.
Uzini Constituency Representative, Mohamed
Raza, was of the opinion that Zanzibar President should have full
powers just like the Union President so that he could decide on
Zanzibar's membership to join the Organisation of Islamic Countries
(OIC) and other economic organisations.
The Commission under Warioba is in Zanzibar collecting view and opinions that would be used to formulate the new Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment